Kevin 的个人资料The doc who thinks outsi...照片日志列表 工具 帮助

日志


11月17日

Proof of fraud in the Minnesota Senate Race between Norm Coleman and Al Franken

The vote gap between Norm Coleman (R) and Al Franken (D for Dumb) has progressively narrowed from 727 to 236. What's more than a bit suspicious about this is that several news sources have reported finding batches of ballots with ALL votes for Franken and NONE for Coleman. That's like spilling a piggy bank with 491 pennies in it, and finding that all just happen to land with heads facing up. The odds of that are so astronomical that it is many trillions of times less probable than beyond a reasonable doubt. Even when the votes are found in heavily Democratic areas — something highly suspicious in itself — it still stinks to high heaven. When asked about this, Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota agreed that it defied rational explanation because Coleman would be expected to receive about one-third of the votes in those Democratic areas. Get out your scientific calculator and plug in (.67) yx (491); the result isn't appreciably different from (.5) yx (491). It is still many trillions of times less probable than beyond a reasonable doubt.

The probability of finding just a single batch of 100 votes for Franken is:

In a heavily Democratic area: 0.00000000000000000405

It is very difficult to appreciate how vanishingly small this chance is, but this may help clarify its stark improbability. Imagine that you had a piggy bank filled with 100 coins. If you could spill the coins, count the number of heads and tails, and replace them in the piggy bank every 10 seconds (and good luck doing it that fast!), it would still take about 80 billion years to have a reasonable chance of the coins landing with all heads or tails up.

In a typical area (representative of the whole state): 0.000000000000000000000000000000788

That would take a mere 800 trillion years.

Statistical improbabilities far more likely than these are sufficient to send men to the electric chair, so we have, once again, proof that the Democrats are cheating. If they weren't so ignorant of statistics, they could have concocted a better way to cheat.

Repeat after me, D is for Dumb.

Here is another one of the mental defects associated with liberalism.

评论

请稍候...
很抱歉,您输入的评论太长。请缩短您的评论。
您没有输入任何内容,请重试。
很抱歉,我们当前无法添加您的评论。请稍后重试。
若要添加评论,需要您的家长授予您相应权限。请求权限
您的家长禁用了评论功能。
很抱歉,我们当前无法删除您的评论。请稍后重试。
您已超过了一天之内允许提供的评论数上限。请在 24 小时后重试。
因为我们的系统表明您可能在向其他用户提供垃圾评论,您的帐户已禁用了评论功能。如果您认为我们错误地禁用了您的帐户,请联系 Windows Live 支持部门
完成下面的安全检查,您提供评论的过程才能完成。
您在安全检查中键入的字符必须与图片或音频中的字符一致。

若要添加评论,请使用您的 Windows Live ID 登录(如果您使用过 Hotmail、Messenger 或 Xbox LIVE,您就拥有 Windows Live ID)。登录


还没有 Windows Live ID 吗?请注册

引用通告

此日志的引用通告 URL 是:
http://doctorandmore.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!6864A2A92E5EEBA7!194.trak
引用此项的网络日志